BRAND PORTFOLIO STRATEGY

From brand clutter to clarity

Most multi-brand portfolios grow through a mix of mergers, acquisitions, and opportunistic launches. Growth adds value—but also complexity, overlap, and strategic questions.

Through brand portfolio strategy and brand architecture strategy, we help teams move from brand clutter to clarity. The result is internal alignment and a path to focused growth.

What is brand portfolio strategy?

Managing a multi-brand portfolio requires strategy at both the individual brand level and the portfolio level.

A collection of strong brands doesn’t automatically create a strong brand portfolio. Why? Because brands within a portfolio interact in ways that can be either complementary or counterproductive.

Brand portfolio strategy defines the number and position of brands with the goal of maximizing total value while minimizing cost and complexity. Brand architecture is a closely related step that defines the relationship between these brands.

Before portfolio strategy

  • Brand overlap creates overall confusion

  • Brands compete with each other

  • Brands are launched with inadequate support

  • Team is stretched thin supporting brands

  • Unclear focus for portfolio growth

After portfolio strategy

  • Each brand has a clear, distinct market position

  • Brands reinforce each others’ performance

  • Each brand is resourced and growing

  • The team is aligned on how to grow

STEP ONE

Brand portfolio review

We assess your current portfolio to collect high-level insights about each brand, your market context, and your business goals.

Common questions we address

  • What is our shared focus?

  • What is the shape of our market?

  • What are each brands strengths?

Internal interviews

Structured internal interviews help to establish a baseline for the team’s core competencies and focus.

Competitive research

In this context, competitive research is primarily used to map the market at a high level, establishing the space in which your portfolio can move and grow.

Brand equity assessment

A high level assessment of brand equities guides the constraints and opportunities of portfolio rationalization.

STEP TWO

Brand portfolio rationalization

With a profile of each brand, we create a portfolio map and explore the pros and cons of different portfolio scenarios.

Common questions we address

  • Where can we simplify?

  • Where should we expand?

  • How does each brand stay distinct?

  • Who should each brand serve?

Portfolio mapping

We visually represent your current brand portfolio vs future portfolio possibilities. This addresses several questions at once and focuses attention on giving each brand a distinct “job” within the portfolio.

Audience segmentation

At this stage, we’ll also create general audience segments based on current audiences, growth audiences, and overall category usage.

Consultation and selection

We work with your team to assess the pros and cons of each scenario, guiding the team toward alignment on a final strategy. From here, each brand within the portfolio can be evaluated and rebranded as-needed based on its refined role.

STEP THREE

Brand architecture strategy

Once a portfolio strategy is in place, brand architecture further defines the relationship between the brands in a portfolio.

Common questions we address

  • What’s the best brand structure for our portfolio?

  • How should child and parent brands relate?

  • What are our best cross-marketing opportunities?

Brand structure selection

We guide your team toward the best brand structure for your portfolio. Common structures include Branded House, House of Brands, Endorsed Brands, and Hybrid.

Brand hierarchy

Finally, we’ll define the relationship between brands in the portfolio and how that relationship should appear in brand marketing.

Brand portfolio strategy FAQ

Simplified answers to common customer questions.

  • As few as possible while maintaining brand focus and capturing market opportunities.

  • The most consistent, understandable structure you can achieve without overly disrupting your current brand equity.

  • When the connection between the brand and service is so indirect that the service drags the brand down instead of the brand lifting the service up.

  • Clearly differentiate using at least one of the following: audience, product / service, or use occasion.

  • Avoid it unless it adds more clarity than complexity for your audience.

  • When a portfolio generally has a shared audience or is seeking to connect with investors, a parent brand creates transfer of trust and boosts collective value.

  • This is most likely an internal question that won’t mean much to your audiences. Give each brand the right job and let it lead that job.

  • Prioritize how well each brand is optimized for its job. It’s more important to align internal teams than to align brands externally.

  • Find the values that all the brand teams have in common and build a shared culture around those values.

  • Loss aversion is usually loudest—“Are you going to ruin what I like or value?” Lead with assurance, follow with what will improve.

Portfolio strategy case study

Ready to sort out your brand portfolio?

No pressure, no gimmicks, no spam.

Just a real conversation to move you in the right direction.